🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding the comments delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz during the US Open quarter-finals. Look – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. Some letdown was appropriate. Instead, he invoked the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone love a narrative, myself included. But come on. Even if the American defeated the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, who Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a tired Djokovic in the next round). He stated in press after the loss that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best players in the world in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, 28, is ranked fourth in the world starting this week’s year-end championships and has secured his last six encounters over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that is as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite serve and powerful strength on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to dispose of the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently overmatched. The last several years has witnessed the curious emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless move around with the surprising quickness and fluidity of smaller men. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh restriction on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly surged up to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, Sinner, and including a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing slump of American men lifting major titles when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the respect for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a few championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating numerous opportunities to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, extending the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and forced him to use far too much effort to prevail. Facing set points in the last game, his first serve sailed to the sky. He extended the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, only a consequence of having to hit too many second serves.

The match was quite compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to beat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly seem like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding virtually everyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not only express how he feels or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it forever if I fail to do it,” the American told an interviewer in June of claiming a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {