🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials asks for plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a draft bill that include decreasing the recommended coverage of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during expanded apprehension about business sector influence with health policies. Last month, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “following international guideline limits”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for different infractions “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia states the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We reside in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and harvest that and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with applicable local laws. Moreover, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which enable interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that underage people should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to achieve intended population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was contacted for response.